Nowadays, most API Management Systems® are actually unbundled. In the past, these systems aimed to cover a wide range of use cases and user roles, often growing increasingly complex over time. Many companies and organizations have since discovered that a lightweight API gateway, combined with tailored processes and supporting tools, can be a much better fit for their needs. This is exactly what Membrane API Gateway is designed to support. If you need assistance with your API Management strategy, we’re here to help.
Implementing APIOps with the Membrane API Gateway means managing your API configurations and specifications as code and automating their deployment using GitOps tools like Argo CD or Flux. In this recipe, we walk through how to set up Membrane in a Git-driven workflow and explain how common API management tasks (security, versioning, monitoring, load balancing, A/B testing, and routing) are handled in this setup. The goal is to store everything (gateway config and OpenAPI definitions) in a Git repository, then use GitOps to deploy those configs to running Membrane Docker containers in a Kubernetes cluster.
<api port="8080">
<openapi location="openapi/petstore-v1.yaml" />
</api>
<api port="8080">
<openapi location="openapi/petstore-v1.yaml" />
</api>
petstore-v1.yaml. Membrane will automatically derive the routing (base path and backend server URL) from the OpenAPI document’s servers field. (If needed, you can override the backend by adding a <target> element in the config; in that case Membrane ignores the OpenAPI’s server URLs and uses the provided target instead.) All such configuration, including security policies and traffic rules discussed below, should be represented in this config file.proxies.xml and mount it into the Membrane container at runtime.With this setup, deploying an API change is as simple as a git push. The GitOps operator takes care of rolling out the update to your Docker containers running Membrane, ensuring that the gateway’s config is always in sync with the Git repo (single source of truth). This automation drastically reduces manual steps and chances for configuration drift.
Security policies for your APIs are defined declaratively in the Membrane config file, just like any other setting. Membrane provides a variety of security interceptors and options, such as API key validation, OAuth2/JWT verification, basic authentication, IP access control, content filtering, rate limiting. To enforce a security measure, you include the corresponding element in the config.
For example, to require an API key for a certain API, you might include an <apiKey> or <apiKeyFileStore> element in that API’s config section. Or to enforce HTTPS/TLS, you’d configure an <ssl> element with certificates. Because this config is in Git, any change (like updating a certificate or adjusting a policy) is tracked and goes through code review. Secure configuration is thus treated as code: you ensure it’s correct by design (writing the proper rules in the XML) and benefit from code review and versioning to catch mistakes. In practice, achieving security is about writing a correct and secure Membrane configuration – for instance, enabling OAuth2 or JWT validation for endpoints that need authentication, using <basicAuthentication> for simple auth, adding <rateLimiter> to thwart abuse.
(In short: with APIOps the gateway’s security is baked into the config in Git. There are no manual tweaks on the servers – everything, from allowed IPs to validation rules, is under version control.)
Versioning is largely handled by the Git branching model described earlier. Each branch can represent a different stage or version of the API configuration. For example, you might be working on v2 of an API while v1 is live. You could maintain separate OpenAPI files (say petstore-v1.yaml and petstore-v2.yaml) and corresponding config in different branches or folders. The Git history helps you manage these versions:
petstore-v1.yaml and another includes petstore-v2.yaml (or you use separate base paths like /api/v1/* and /api/v2/* with routing rules). Both versions can be deployed by the gateway concurrently. Because the OpenAPI definitions are in the repo, you can update them and roll out changes to just one version’s spec as needed.proxies-dev.xml and proxies-prod.xml, and have your deployment use the appropriate one for the environment. Alternatively, you might use placeholders in the config that get replaced via your CI/CD pipeline or Kubernetes Secrets for sensitive data. The key is that any difference is documented. Nothing is changed ad hoc in production; even a one-line config change goes through Git.Overall, Git together with Membrane allows robust version control: you can track exactly which config/version is deployed in each environment (just by checking the commit hash or branch). Rollbacks are as easy as reverting a commit in Git (the GitOps tool will then sync back to the previous config). This dramatically reduces risk when making changes—if a new API or change misbehaves, you can restore the last known-good state quickly via Git.
<prometheus/> element in the config, Membrane will expose its internal metrics in Prometheus format. For example, you could include:<serviceProxy port="8080">
… (your API proxy config) …
<prometheus/>
<serviceProxy>
<serviceProxy port="8080">
… (your API proxy config) …
<prometheus/>
<serviceProxy>
<prometheus/> (or other desired) element across your API definitions.<balancer> configuration element. In your Git-managed config, you can list a cluster of backend nodes for an API, and Membrane will distribute incoming calls among them. For example, to route traffic for an API to three backend nodes, your config might include:<api port="2000" name="MyService">
<balancer>
<clusters>
<cluster name="prod-backend">
<node host="node1.example.com" port="8080"/>
<node host="node2.example.com" port="8090"/>
<node host="node3.example.com" port="8100"/>
</cluster>
</clusters>
<!-- optional: strategy like <roundRobinStrategy/> could be specified here -->
</balancer>
</api>
<api port="2000" name="MyService">
<balancer>
<clusters>
<cluster name="prod-backend">
<node host="node1.example.com" port="8080"/>
<node host="node2.example.com" port="8090"/>
<node host="node3.example.com" port="8100"/>
</cluster>
</clusters>
<!-- optional: strategy like <roundRobinStrategy/> could be specified here -->
</balancer>
</api>
<if> interceptor together with <destination> to conditionally divert requests. For example, suppose you want 10% of users (or those with a certain cookie) to hit a new version of a service:Conceptually, it might look like this in the configuration:
<api port="3000" name="UserService">
<!-- Conditional route to UserService v2 for A/B test: -->
<if test="request.headers['X-Beta-User'] == 'true'" language="SpEL">
<destination url="https://api.v2.example.com/user"/>
</if>
<!-- Default backend for UserService v1: -->
<target url="https://api.v1.example.com/user"/>
</api>
<api port="3000" name="UserService">
<!-- Conditional route to UserService v2 for A/B test: -->
<if test="request.headers['X-Beta-User'] == 'true'" language="SpEL">
<destination url="https://api.v2.example.com/user"/>
</if>
<!-- Default backend for UserService v1: -->
<target url="https://api.v1.example.com/user"/>
</api>
In this snippet, if a request carries X-Beta-User: true header, it will hit the v2 backend; all others go to the default v1 target. The order is important: we configure the default <target> at the end and the <if> beforehand, which overrides the destination if the condition matches. Membrane evaluates the rules in sequence, but the <target> is always evaluated first. The <destination> element sets a new backend URL for the request when the condition is true. This combination of <if> and <destination> gives you flexible traffic splitting logic.
All A/B test rules live in the config, so enabling, adjusting, or disabling a test is a matter of editing the Git repository. For instance, to turn off the experiment, you might comment out or remove the <if> block in Git and push – the next deployment will then send 100% of traffic to the primary backend again. This approach is much safer than toggling live systems by hand; you can code review the conditions (to ensure you’re targeting the correct subset) before they affect real users.
Beyond simple load balancing and A/B conditions, you might require more complex routing logic (for example, routing based on contents of the URL path, query parameters, or more intricate business rules). Membrane provides a <choose> element (analogous to a switch/case construct) to handle multi-branch logic cleanly. Instead of nesting many <if> statements, you can do:
<choose>
<case test="exchange.request.uri.matches('^/api/v1/.')">
<destination url="http://v1-backend.internal.local"/>
</case>
<case test="exchange.request.uri.matches('^/api/v2/.')">
<destination url="http://v2-backend.internal.local"/>
</case>
<otherwise>
<destination url="http://default-backend.internal.local"/>
</otherwise>
</choose>
<choose>
<case test="exchange.request.uri.matches('^/api/v1/.')">
<destination url="http://v1-backend.internal.local"/>
</case>
<case test="exchange.request.uri.matches('^/api/v2/.')">
<destination url="http://v2-backend.internal.local"/>
</case>
<otherwise>
<destination url="http://default-backend.internal.local"/>
</otherwise>
</choose>
/api/v1/ to one backend, those starting with /api/v2/ to another, and anything else to a default. This is just an illustration – the conditions can be any boolean expression (in a supported language) and can examine headers, payloads, etc. The <otherwise> block catches anything that didn’t match prior cases. The Membrane documentation on the <choose> element shows how to use <case> and <otherwise> for complex routing decisions.<target> element inside the API or serviceProxy definition to point to the backend URL or host/port. In fact, if you’re not doing conditional routing, a basic Membrane config might be as straightforward as:<serviceProxy port="8080" name="CatalogAPI">
<target host="catalog.internal.svc.cluster.local" port="80"/>
</serviceProxy>
<serviceProxy port="8080" name="CatalogAPI">
<target host="catalog.internal.svc.cluster.local" port="80"/>
</serviceProxy>
catalog.internal.svc.cluster.local:80. In APIOps, that line in the config is how routing is defined – so any change (say, the backend moves to a different host or port) is done by editing that <target> line in Git. Nothing is changed on the gateway container manually.| API Management Task | Handled through APIOps with Membrane |
|---|---|
| Security | Defined in config as code (e.g., authentication, authorization, data validation rules via Membrane interceptors). Secure settings are reviewed and versioned in Git. Membrane’s security features (OAuth2, API keys, SSL, etc.) are enabled by adding the appropriate config elements. |
| Versioning | Managed via Git branches and files. Different API versions or environment configurations reside in separate branches (or separate files), promoting through stages by merging. The OpenAPI specs themselves are versioned in Git, and Membrane can deploy multiple versions concurrently if configured (e.g., two <api> entries for v1 and v2). Rollbacks and audits are easy with Git history. |
| Monitoring | Instrumentation is part of the config (e.g., include <prometheus/> in Membrane config to export metrics or <openTelemetry/> to export traces). Once enabled via Git and deployed, your gateways expose metrics that tools like Prometheus can scrape and export OpenTelemetry traces when HTTP requests are passing through. |
| Load Balancing | Implemented by config as well: use Membrane’s <balancer> element to list multiple backend nodes. Strategies (round-robin, etc.) can be set in config. Adjusting the pool of backends = editing the list in Git. This ensures consistency between environments (e.g., both test and prod can use similar balancer configs, just with different node addresses). |
| A/B Testing | Achieved with conditional routing rules in the config. Use <if> (with a test expression) and <destination> to route a subset of traffic to an alternate service. All in Git – making an A/B test is a code change. You can peer-review the logic and remove it when the experiment is done by deleting that block in the config. |
| Routing | Both simple and complex routing are defined in the config. Simple static routing uses <target> within a proxy/API definition to forward to a specific URL or host. Complex routing uses <choose> with multiple <case> conditions for different criteria. Because routes are in Git, they stay documented. Changes to routing (e.g., updating a URL, adding a new rule) follow the same process as any code change, ensuring reliability. |
By following this recipe, you treat your API gateway configuration just like software code. Membrane’s flexibility (with its XML configuration supporting conditional logic, multiple environment settings, and direct OpenAPI inclusion) paired with GitOps deployment means you get the benefits of automation and version control in API management. This leads to less error-prone operations, faster iterations (you can deploy changes in minutes through Git), and a clear history of how your API policies evolved over time.
With all pieces in place (Git repository, Membrane config, OpenAPI specs, and Argo CD/Flux piping it to Kubernetes) you have a robust APIOps implementation: any change to an API or its policies goes through Git, and the running Membrane Gateway containers are always synchronized with the Git state. This empowers teams to collaborate on API changes safely and efficiently, using modern DevOps practices for API management.